Mr. Chairman, I would like to reply to last week's
statement by my Belarusian colleague on the continued
imprisonment of former Prime Minister Mikhail
Chigir.
My colleague enumerated an impressive list of
statutes of the criminal code that Mr. Chigir had
reportedly violated.
What was missing, however, was an indication of the
specific actions Mr. Chigir had taken in violation of
the law; exactly how he had overstepped his authority;
and how he had abused his position.
The vagueness and generality of the charges, as well
as the lengthy time taken to file them, have given us
the impression that the decision to arrest him was made
first, and only later began the search for evidence.
This effort has all the hallmarks of a political
persecution rather than a serious criminal
investigation.
It is for this reason that the U.S. has joined the
Belarusian opposition in calling for Mr. Chigir's
immediate release.
I would compare this with another recent case that we
believe is in contravention to OSCE principles as
well.
The newspaper Naviny recently published a
story critical of the Belarusian Head of National
Security for building a luxurious house. There was no
attempt at this point by the Belarusian criminal justice
system to launch an investigation of potential
corruption.
Instead, the government moved swiftly against the
newspaper. The Belarusian court crushed the newspaper
with an enormous libel settlement on behalf of the
aggrieved public official.
To us, the lesson of these cases is clear. If you are
a former official who has quarreled with the regime,
they will spare no effort or imagination to convict you
for some imagined infraction of the law. If, on the
other hand, you serve the regime, not only will you
not be investigated, but the full force of the
state will come down against those who accuse you.
Mr. Chairman, it has now been over 90 days since
President Lukashenko announced his desire to open a
window to the West.
We were assured, both publicly and privately, that
this was a serious initiative, and that specific
measures would be soon forthcoming.
In the intervening period, we have seen the continued
detention of Mr. Chigir, the miscarriage of justice in
the case against Naviny, the closing of nine
independent newspapers over the past two weeks, and the
disappearance of Viktor Gonchar. And just yesterday, the
Belarusian Government banned the opposition's March for
Freedom, scheduled for this Sunday, October 17. We would
hope to get an explanation for this, an explanation that
points towards a democratic development in
Belarus.