Mr. Chairman, since our last meeting in this room,
disturbing reports from Chechnya have raised further
concerns about the scale of violence as well as the
operational methods that are being employed by the
Russian military.
President Yeltsin stated last week that the second
phase of operations has been completed and that a third
phase is beginning. That statement was circulated by the
Russian Federation’s delegation on December 6
(SEC.DEL/340/99).
We note that the Russian Vienna Document notification
of October 28 addressed only the first phase of
operations.
Moreover, recent Russian press reports describe a
major escalation in the fighting, which is now
characterized by some as a full-scale war.
In the interest of transparency and making possible a
more objective understanding of what looks to us to be a
new situation, we call on Russia to fully comply with
its Vienna Document commitment and to notify up-to-date
details on its force disposition and military
objectives.
An observation visit, as Russia promised in its
October 28 notification, would also enhance all OSCE
States' ability to assess objectively the situation. The
gradual normalization of conditions that we have heard
about in this forum argues for an observation visit to
take place in the near future.
As we have said here before, we question neither
Russia's right nor responsibility to fight terrorism.
However, we remain deeply concerned with the means
Russia has chosen to do so.
We have repeatedly raised here and elsewhere concerns
about the indiscriminate and disproportionate use of
force.
We are deeply disturbed by reports that Russia has
dropped leaflets over Chechnya warning the residents of
Grozny to leave the city and declaring that all who
remain will be "destroyed."
We cannot accept the implication that the defeat of
terrorist bands requires the destruction of Grozny, to
include the homes and business of innocent civilians, as
well as the infrastructure that sustains them.
This method of operations would threaten the old, the
infirm, and others who cannot or are afraid to leave,
who would likely die in the thousands. The provision of
prior warning in no way relieves Russia of its
obligation to differentiate between legitimate targets
and innocent civilians.
Russia's ultimatum or, if you wish to parse words,
warning with a time limit, to the civilian residents of
Grozny is inconsistent with Russia's Code of Conduct
commitments to ensure that the use of force is
"commensurate" and that Russian armed forces "take due
care to avoid injury to civilians or their property."
Last week, Germany, citing paragraphs 29 and 30 of
the Code of Conduct, questioned the adequacy of training
for Russian troops so that they understood fully their
responsibilities to uphold international humanitarian
law. Russian forces' continued, indiscriminate
application of massive firepower against Grozny and
other population centers lend credence to our German
colleagues’ concerns.
In his December 6 Human Rights Day speech, President
Clinton said, "Russia's fight against terrorism is
right, but the methods being used in Chechnya are wrong.
And I am convinced they will be counterproductive. . . .
Russia will pay a heavy price for those actions with
each passing day, sinking deeply into a morass that will
intensify extremism and diminish its own standing in the
world."
We call on the Government of Russia, as a friend, not
as an adversary, to seek a political solution to the
conflict in Chechnya, consistent with its commitments in
paragraph 19 of the Code of Conduct.
The scheduled visit of Chairman-in-Office Vollebaek
to the North Caucasus could prove to be an important
step in the pursuit of a political solution to the
conflict. We look forward to that visit with the hope
and the expectation that it could become part of a
political solution to this tragic series of events.
Russia’s OSCE partners stand ready to assist Russia
in finding a solution to the tragedy of Chechnya and in
creating conditions for stability, security, and
economic prosperity in the region, as we all affirmed at
Istanbul. Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.